Search for: "Parker v. Parker" Results 601 - 620 of 2,548
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2018, 7:25 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals reinstates the case and the plaintiffs are back in federal court.The case is Catzin v. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
In a leading decision of the Supreme Court in AR, R (on the application of) v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police & Anor [2018] UKSC 47 on 30 July, a man identified as AR appealed against the content of his ECRC. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 4:53 am by Victoria Clark
Kristy Parker and Ben Berwick argued that Trump’s threat violates the officials’ first amendment right to criticize the president. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 5:10 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
David Parker, Jr., No. 112,959 (Sedgwick)Direct appeal (petition for review); Possession/Fleeing and EludingChristina M. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 8:05 am by Andrew Hamm
” Briefly: Following Lucia v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 8:27 am by Carol Steiker and Jordan Steiker
Steiker is the Judge Robert M Parker Endowed Chair in Law and Director of the Capital Punishment Center at the University of Texas at Austin School of Law. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 1:13 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Yes, because the yellow cabs and the Uber cars are not "similarly-situated," meaning the government can treat them differently.The Court of Appeals (Jacobs, Sack and Parker) details how the yellow cabs differ from the Uber cars. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 1:55 pm by Howard Friedman
  Most of his claims were dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, while his complaint regarding observance of a fast day was found not to have amounted to a substantial burden on his free exercise.In Parker v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:15 pm by Timothy B. Lee
(credit: Federal Circuit Historical Society / Aurich Lawson) Forty years ago this week, in the case of Parker v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
  Now the parties have agreed on the scope of a permanent injunction, and this week in Parker v. [read post]