Search for: "Paul Levin"
Results 601 - 620
of 702
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2009, 1:02 am
Levine ruling. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 10:30 am
Levine (06-1249). [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 3:58 am
" Justice John Paul Stevens wrote for the majority, saying, "Wyeth has not persuaded us that failure-to-warn claims like Levine's obstruct the federal regulation of drug labeling. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 8:17 pm
" Justice John Paul Stevens wrote for the majority, saying, "Wyeth has not persuaded us that failure-to-warn claims like Levine's obstruct the federal regulation of drug labeling. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 5:37 am
Our own Jim Copland and Paul Howard of the Manhattan Institute, in the Washington Times; Gordon Crovitz, in the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 7:06 am
Justice John Paul Stevens issued a statement (not formally a dissent) as the Court refused to hear a case involving a Florida inmate who has been on death row for 32 years, in which he renewed his previous call for the Court to put an end to the death penalty. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 6:54 am
Levine that state juries can, in essence, override the Food and Drug Administration's considered safety judgments. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 6:54 am
Levine that state juries can, in essence, override the Food and Drug Administration's considered safety judgments. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:36 pm
” Justice John Paul Stevens, writing for the majority in Wednesday’s decision, Wyeth v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 8:28 am
Levine case, yesterday. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 6:49 am
In writing for the majority, Justice John Paul Stevens said it was possible for Wyeth to comply with both federal and state laws in this matter. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 2:17 am
Justice John Paul Stevens, writing for the majority in Wednesday's decision, Wyeth v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 1:54 pm
We conclude that they do not," Justice John Paul Stevens concluded in the court's majority opinion. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 11:06 am
Levine. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 8:21 am
Wyeth v .Levine!!!! [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 8:21 am
Wyeth v .Levine!!!! [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 8:17 am
"Congress did not intend FDA oversight to be the exclusive means of ensuring drug safety and effectiveness," Justice John Paul Stevens wrote for the court. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:08 am
Levine, No. 06-1249, at this link. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:04 am
Levine (06-1249). [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 3:16 am
Justice John Paul Stevens, in the majority opinion, said FDA oversight of drug labeling doesn't prevent the filing of state-level consumer liability lawsuits against drug companies. [read post]
