Search for: "People of the State of New York v. Smith"
Results 601 - 620
of 872
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2012, 4:19 am
Now suppose that a Catholic or other religious hospital in New York objects to making Social Security payments for some or even all of its employees on the ground that such payments will go to support Social Security disability and survivor benefits for the same-sex spouses of people married under New York law, and thus under federal law. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 9:55 am
United States and Alberts v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 1:00 pm
When the US Supreme Court ruled in Smith v. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 7:55 am
For more information see these articles from CBS , the New York Times and the Huffington Post. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:40 pm
Although the postal service has been declared a non-person, today’s decision cannot detract from the federal agency’s heartwarming role in the landmark case of State of New York v. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm
The Guardian, BBC, New York Times and Reuters all have coverage. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 9:06 am
" Adam Liptak wrote about the case in December 2005 in the New York Times report, "Date Missed, Court Rebuffs Low-I.Q. [read post]
28 May 2015, 7:44 am
This was done first in New York, in the Field Code of 1848. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am
The Norweigan hacker Runa Sandvik has launched Granitt, a service for at-risk people like activists, journalists and refugees. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 5:54 pm
On 26 October 2022, there was a hearing in the case of Smith v Backhouse. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 2:07 pm
In the “good old days” of Smith v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
17 May 2011, 6:38 pm
Lamar Smith et al. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 4:05 am
This same battle was already fought, and lost, back in the 1980s with Smith v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:23 am
Now, the Cambridge statute was even more onerous than the New York statute under which Jim Harmon labors … but not much more onerous. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
Contrast that with the approach of the New York Metropolitan Museum of Art which recently made the images of it's artworks in the public domain freely available through a new open access policy, without restrictions. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 7:48 pm
The case of United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 9:55 am
Among the highlights: NSSTA President Henry Strong: Introduced Smith Bucklin , NSSTA's new association management company. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:57 am
" The New York Court of Appeals decision in People v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am
Such written agreement must state that it will be the responsibility of the adoptive parent(s) to inform the appropriate State or local official when they are no longer legally responsible for the child or no longer providing any support to the child” (18 NYCRR 421.24[c][5]). [read post]
