Search for: "People v Baker"
Results 601 - 620
of 936
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2022, 11:20 am
Mead PS, Slutsker L, Dietz V, McCaig LF, Bresee JS, Shapiro C, et al. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 12:21 pm
Baker (1818) 16 U.S. 541, 545); quite recently, it determined that a fish is not a “tangible object” (United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 12:06 pm
entry=521 Walmart v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 5:04 am
See, e.g., People ex rel. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am
It would be odd and potentially onerous if, even while the authority were simply considering the merits of the claimant’s position, they were unable to house the family in two adjoining units even on a temporary basis.Further, Scott Baker J in R v Ealing London Borough Council ex parte Surdonja [1999] 1 ALL ER 566 took the view that:“In my judgment the obligation is not discharged by providing split accommodation in separate dwellings. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 12:03 pm
[v].) [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 9:36 am
Don't ask Her Honor how she would've decided District of Columbia v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 4:50 am
Ark.) in For AR Kids v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 8:37 am
Blount Patent Rights Under Space Act Agreements and Procurement Contracts: A Comparison by the Examination of NASA’s Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) by Tiphany Baker Dickerson Space Tourism Activities – Emerging Challenges to Air and Space Law? [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
Bickel’s account – essentially, to emphasize the principles underlying the 14th Amendment and its capacity for growth, rather than how people at the time understood it – is of a piece with one of the ways originalists try to save their approach from generating unacceptable conclusions. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm
The case continues and closing submissions will be heard on 19 November 2019 On the same day the Court of Appeal ((Lewison, Bean and Baker LJJ) handed down judgment in the case of Euroeco Fuels (Poland) Limited and ors v. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm
Lachaux v Independent Print, heard 13 and 14 November 2018 (UKSC) ZXC v Bloomberg, heard 27-28 and 30 November 2018 (Nicklin J) R (on the application of Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal, heard 3 and 4 December 2018 (UKSC) Ali v Channel 5, heard 4 December 2018 (Irwin, Newey and Baker LJJ). [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 11:55 am
Feist Publ'ns, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 1:24 am
On the same day Bean J heard the “offer of amends” case of KC v MGN Ltd – a claim by the natural father of “Baby P” wrongly accused in The People of being a sex offender convicted of raping a 14-year-old girl. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
Co. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
Supreme Court Baker v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
Supreme Court Baker v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 4:13 am
” At Take Care, Leah Litman considers what light Azar v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 3:35 am
Byrd and State v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 1:19 am
For such reasons, we hold that the fair market value of the goods and services received by the petitioners is the prices charged by the partnership's clients to their retail customers.Similarly, in Baker v. [read post]
