Search for: "People v Holder" Results 601 - 620 of 2,558
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2023, 5:37 am by Jeff Welty
App. 510 (2016) (fact that defendant’s nickname resembled the name on a social media account tended to show that defendant was the account holder and author of posts on the account); State v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:01 pm by Bexis
Lexis 1688, at *25-26 n.8 (citing Wyeth v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 2:19 pm by Ilya Somin
In other contexts too, the Constitution bars laws punishing people who assist in or facilitate the exercise of a constitutional right, as well as the immediate rights-holders themselves. [read post]
8 May 2020, 2:28 pm
  On the theory that doing so would "invade the privacy" of account holders and increase costs.Which is a tiny bit true. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:00 am
Stuart considered that five years is not necessarily too long for a mark holder to claim a monopoly right if there is a genuine intention to use the mark. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 9:28 am by Ben
Just a little bit more pressure and all would be under control.Then, when the landmark MGM Studios v. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 8:35 am by David Post
(David Post) As I’ve noted before on a number of occasions, a possible landmark copyright case is now before the 2d Circuit, Viacom et al. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2013, 2:03 pm by Florian Mueller
But every now and then there could be a problem with a right holder wielding copyright in an effort to prevent interoperability, just like there are standard-essential patent (SEP) owners, like Google, who pursue injunctions. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 10:34 am by Mi Patente
For many people, Internet is both a “threat” and a “great opportunity”. [read post]