Search for: "People v Legall"
Results 601 - 620
of 30,821
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2008, 3:21 pm
For reasons that are not at all surprising given both the nature of this institution as well as the facts underlying the sentence.This is not to assert, by the way, that the California Supreme Court in the post-Bird era is totally incapable of exercising detached legal judgment in death penalty cases. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 10:39 pm
And, among other things, recall seeing the Canoga Park Wienerschnitzel -- a chain, among others, of which this East Coast boy had never heard a peep.Based upon this (admittedly long-ago) experience, I can say fairly confidently that it surprised me not in the least that there were multiple gang-related murders at this establishment.Check out the opinion for a fairly good discussion (by both the majority and the dissent) of the nature of gangs in the modern era as well as the legal… [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 11:22 am
I don't care how a legal theory might be articulated in a good test case. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 10:35 am
My strong sense is that, in such a case, this panel would not view the entry as de minimus but would instead uphold the imprisonment of the defendant for many years.But what's illegal and unreasonable for individuals is perhaps legal and right for police officers. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 6:58 am
" See Griswold v. [read post]
17 May 2008, 4:45 am
The nation's sexual revolution of the 1960s fueled a social movement of people seeking repeal of sodomy laws, but it was not until the Supreme Court's decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 2:45 pm
Joseph Sanders (University of Houston): Milward v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 12:17 pm
Perhaps not from a legal standpoint, but just as a matter of fairness and settled expectations. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 7:37 am
John’s Law Review will be hosting a symposium on West Virginia v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 1:30 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 10:01 am
Shannon Quadros wrote, in comments to Us v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:02 am
Donald Trump, et al. (23-CR-80101-AMC) New York (NY): The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 3:22 am
There are some basic rules in legal malpractice litigation about fees. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 9:54 am
The post Christina Swarns Exposes Risk of A Right to Fair Trial in New York Times on SCOTUS Case Shinn v. [read post]
31 May 2014, 8:29 am
This is the stuff of great legal theatre and Act I of Kerik v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 11:39 am
Earlier this week, the Michigan Court of Appeals held in People v. [read post]
5 Mar 2025, 9:45 am
Tian v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 1:10 pm
"The point is this: Yes, it'd be remarkably random for Wear to interject in a text fight about flirting with people over Facebook that he intended to kill some random guy not involved at all in the whole Facebook dispute. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 8:42 pm
The decision varies from In Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd (ACN 004 551 473) v Amcor Limited (ACN 000 017 372)[2008] FCA 88 in which the Federal Court rejected the ACCC's claim for legal professional privilege and public interest immunity privilege in relation to 111 witness statements drafted by ACCC investigators in connection with the ACCC proceedings against Visy . [read post]
