Search for: "People v May"
Results 601 - 620
of 44,057
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2012, 10:14 am
And what they might well have meant is to punish extra hard people who molest people younger than ten. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 11:36 am
Barker, Arista v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 2:48 pm
The following are issues that the Supreme Court will consider in Lee v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 12:26 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 2:17 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 7:29 am
Query to fellow practitioners:The May 15th order entered yesterday in Capitol v. [read post]
14 Oct 2012, 7:12 am
Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 12:59 pm
” (People v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 9:00 am
" Montejo v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 10:09 am
But some people. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 11:02 am
Works every time.As I said, it may well be that Rosalinda has some serious problems. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 12:11 pm
" What we do with the witness is another issue; he doesn't have a privilege claim, so we may well be holding him in contempt. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 1:01 pm
Constitutional law may be amorphous to a degree, but it's not infinitely malleable. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:15 am
He says that "[w]hile an argument may prove unmeritorious, that is for the court ultimately to determine," not counsel, and that's the heart of things. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 12:06 pm
It may be an infraction, but it's still a crime. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 2:40 pm
The trial court held a contested hearing on the petition on May 3, 2018 and found that Contreraz violated his probation. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 4:08 pm
He pleads no context to a plethora of charges, some of which were alleged to have occurred prior to October 1, 2011, some of which were alleged to have occurred thereafter, and some of which may have occurred in either of these categories.This matters. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 12:08 pm
But here, the trial court lets defendant plead guilty to a misdemeanor -- although the prosecution, which had filed felony charges, opposes such relief -- because if he pleads guilty to a felony, under his contract with Subway, he may well lose his Subway stores.God forbid we should deprive you of the instrumentality of your crimes, eh? [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 10:00 am
It may just mean that it was somewhat in abeyance at the time …. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 2:14 pm
"You can read the entire opinion for which $100/$300 fines were permissible, which were required, and which were impermissible.Just remember that this whole thing is about fines that (1) may never in fact be paid -- or at least not paid with a real check (the defendant was repeatedly convicted of forgery); and (2) in any event are far smaller than the costs of prosecuting and resolving this appeal. [read post]
