Search for: "People v RICHARD S." Results 601 - 620 of 3,536
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2015, 3:10 pm by Andrew Crocker
EFF’s Long History of Trying to Stop NSA Spying in the Courts EFF first sued over the tapping into AT&T’s fiber optic cables in 2006 in a case called Hepting v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:47 pm by Dave
 The benefit cap JR got lost amongst that other stuff partly because it was almost predictable after MA that the Divisional Court would find a way to uphold it.Actually, though, having read it again the other day for a different reason, the benefit cap challenge – R(JS) v SSWP [2013] EWHC 3350 (QB) – was very clever (CPAG and Shelter were joined as interveners – CPAG’s arguments can be found here) and the appeal is to be heard pretty soon, having… [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:47 pm by Dave
 The benefit cap JR got lost amongst that other stuff partly because it was almost predictable after MA that the Divisional Court would find a way to uphold it.Actually, though, having read it again the other day for a different reason, the benefit cap challenge – R(JS) v SSWP [2013] EWHC 3350 (QB) – was very clever (CPAG and Shelter were joined as interveners – CPAG’s arguments can be found here) and the appeal is to be heard pretty soon, having… [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 11:38 am by Todd Zywicki
(Todd Zywicki) Speaking of amicus briefs, shortly before Christmas Josh Wright and I filed a brief in support of a petition for certiorari in an appeal from the 5th Circuit’s decision in Wine Country Gift Baskets.com v. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost maintains that “[p]olitical differences aside, a common-sense reading of Kavanaugh’s testimony shows that he is ready if confirmed to vote to overrule the abortion-rights decision Roe v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 1:20 pm
British Columbia’s judges cannot preside over out-of-province hearings but may use video conferencing to connect with B.C. courtrooms from afar, under an appeal court ruling.Endean v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:25 am by David DePaolo
The board reasoned that Stephen’s agreement with Family Dollar prohibited Mamie from seeking death benefits, as her claim was derivative of his.The Court of Appeals disagreed and vacated the board's decision on Friday based on a state Supreme Court case from 1930, called Brashear v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 4:18 am
Matter of Wolpoff v Cuomo, 80 NY2d 70, 78), it must yield (see People v Allen, 301 NY 287, 290). [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
Richard Hasen is the Chancellor’s Professor of Law and Political Science at the University of California, Irvine School of Law. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 6:17 am by David Markus
 Prior to yesterday’s decision in Welch v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 4:28 am by Edith Roberts
 Yesterday’s second case was Collins v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 6:11 am by Marissa Miller
This blog’s Shelby County v. [read post]