Search for: "People v. Adams" Results 601 - 620 of 2,232
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2019, 9:40 am by Karen Gullo
”The previously undisclosed government information was obtained as part of a lawsuit, Alasaad v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 5:29 am
“Why do people go to Germany? [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Many people acknowledge that Reagan would not be nearly conservative enough for today’s Republican Party, yet the press cannot resist labeling as “moderates” conservative extremists like Susan Collins (who actually believes, among other things, that tax cuts pay for themselves—and who claimed to believe that Brett Kavanaugh would not overturn Roe v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 1:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
The Q is not how to fix a broken whackamole system but how do platforms discharge their duties based on the risk they introduce, not one size fits all [just two sizes, I guess].Stan Adams Center for Democracy & Technology: Directive provisions are fundamentally problematic and unbalanced v. 512. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Mississippi, which asks whether a prosecutor’s repeated use of peremptory challenges to remove black people from the jury pool violated the Constitution, and False Claims Act case Cochise Consultancy v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 10:17 am by Erik J. Heels
In a viral video, Adam Donyes, the founder of Link Year, tells a group of young people that they will race to win $100. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 8:14 am by Joy Yusi
Is it that you do not, in fact, believe in hiring people in accordance with the Human Rights Code? [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 12:00 am by Scott Bomboy
Roosevelt was particularly upset by the Court’s 1935 decision in Schechter Poultry Corp. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
For The New York Times, Adam Cohen reviews Joan Biskupic’s “assiduously reported and briskly written biography” of Chief Justice John Roberts. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 3:32 pm by Patricia Hughes
Former attorney general Jody Wilson-Raybould’s resistance to the pressure by various actors to instruct the director of public prosecutions to offer to negotiate a remediation agreement (the Canadian name for a deferred prosecution agreement) with SNC-Lavalin and her testimony before the House Judiciary Committee have been explained in different ways: respect for the rule of law and the role of the attorney general, a lack of pragmatism or political experience, too much sense of self, a desire… [read post]