Search for: "People v. Barrett"
Results 601 - 620
of 880
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2020, 2:54 pm
In 2012, a divided court upheld the mandate in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 7:12 am
Today the Supreme Court hears oral argument in California v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) makes its third trip to the Supreme Court today under the caption California v. [read post]
Symposium: “Schrödinger’s tax” is dead – and the command to buy health insurance is unconstitutional
9 Nov 2020, 6:28 am
In Seven-Sky v. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 10:04 am
” In Begay v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 7:26 am
In California v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 5:02 am
The new Justice, Amy Coney Barrett, whom most people assume is not a friend to the Smith decision, pointedly asked CSS's counsel: [Y]ou argue in your brief that Smith should be overruled. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 3:50 am
What California v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 11:54 am
" Mooppan cited Pena–Rodriguez v. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm
Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote about the dignity of same-sex marriage in Obergefell v. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 4:56 pm
Yes, Justice Coney Barrett, Roe v. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 1:27 pm
” In NFIB v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 4:00 pm
The Court will not want a repeat of the calamitous decision in Bush v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 7:16 am
Supreme Court has agreed to hear oral arguments in Trump v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
And all of this is simply a precursor to the repeal of Roe v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 6:29 am
Pritzker (D) that limited most social gatherings to 50 people but exempted religious organizations and houses of worship. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 12:27 pm
In Artis v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 11:41 am
City of Philadelphia—about if a city can choose not to contract with an adoption agency because that agency will not work with gay couples, and argues that the Supreme Court may upend protections for LGBTQ Americans by reframing religious liberty as an equality issue, allowing people with religious objections to serving, hiring, or marrying LGBTQ people the ability to do so. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:02 pm
Supreme Court’s 1932 decision in Smiley v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:00 pm
But the Court itself issued no ruling.More than a century later, the Court entered the fray in Bush v. [read post]
