Search for: "People v. Bounds"
Results 601 - 620
of 3,533
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
" Citing People v Iannone, 45 NY2d 589, in which the Court of Appeals held that, "[w]hen indicting for statutory crimes, it is usually sufficient to charge the language of the statute unless that language is too broad," the Appellate Division opined that "by requiring [Corrections] to prove the underlying crime in the notice to support [applying] the CBA's time exception," the arbitrator essentially added a term to the CBA and, thus, exceeded his… [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 11:04 am
Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 7:39 am
Finding itself bound by State v. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 4:36 am
Ltd v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 8:06 pm
These were people who also deserved his protection, like any member of the public. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 2:58 pm
To this day, people disagree about whether this provision includes only statutory crimes, or wrongs specifically related to the duties associated with the impeachment defendant's position, or both. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 2:09 pm
In Alpine Securities Corp. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 5:41 am
They previously were amici in Google v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 10:05 am
The people who have targeted Mr. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 4:36 pm
BrazilAttorney General v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 6:38 pm
(Graham v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 12:52 pm
In Blum v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 12:52 pm
In Blum v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 11:20 am
Most people have never heard of it. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 1:26 am
If the landlord had no part in choosing or approving the occupiers, could he be bound by them as tenants? [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 1:26 am
If the landlord had no part in choosing or approving the occupiers, could he be bound by them as tenants? [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 7:03 am
App. ___ (May 4, 2021) Holding: In a probable cause hearing the Court is not bound by the rules of evidence. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
Under U.S. v. [read post]
