Search for: "People v. Branch"
Results 601 - 620
of 3,257
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2007, 12:30 pm
In re-reading the DC Circuit's famous recent Second Amendment decision in Parker v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 9:15 am
A few weeks ago, in Shiel v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 2:00 am
When considering the mysteries of the legislature’s having deemed of the Commission to be in the executive branch for at least some purposes while removing it from the control of the executive branch, I am reminded of Justice Antonin Scalia’s dissent in Mistretta v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 4:00 am
Louis IM & S v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 2:38 pm
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the County Court properly denied, without a hearing, those branches of his motion which were to vacate his judgment of conviction on the ground that the People did not disclose various statements made by witnesses as ruled in People v Rosario and Brady v Maryland. [read post]
5 Oct 2008, 3:42 pm
I submit that of the 3 people on the stage that night, Palin was the one who got it right on that question. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 2:01 pm
Why aren’t all three branches called upon to address these issues? [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 11:33 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 1:32 pm
” The government conducts court-authorized searches all the time, in which it seizes people’s property. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 6:00 am
Oral argument was held in FEF v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
" (NSBA v. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 1:14 pm
Instead, I look for a judge who (a) will seek to follow the original meaning of the text of the Constitution, (b) has the intestinal fortitude to invalidate the acts of the majoritarian branches, (c) understands that judges are agents of the people, to whom they owe a duty to hold the other branches within their constitutional powers. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 11:56 am
For instance, in Gutierrez-Brizuela v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 8:10 pm
Supreme Court engaged deeply in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 5:06 am
Accordingly, in the instant action, that branch of the defendant’s motion which was to consolidate the two actions should not have been denied. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 2:02 pm
But bad people sometimes bring meritorious lawsuits. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 6:21 am
Malleiro v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 5:30 am
This is essentially his argument about Brown v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 10:51 am
On Thursday, the Supreme Court decided SEC v. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 8:12 pm
S.J.L.S. v. [read post]
