Search for: "People v. Burden"
Results 601 - 620
of 6,740
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2010, 11:13 am
The California Supreme Court today in a much-anticipated decision, People v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 1:46 pm
There super smart people on the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 12:27 pm
Call me crazy when I say that I'm not totally itching to strike down the law and protect people who don't pay their massive tax debts. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:08 am
Lurches are part of the movement of these buses and something that the people who travel on the buses learn to expect. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
This has been clear since the Court declared in Brown v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 1:01 am
Holder weakened the Voting Rights Act in 2013, and have kept significant numbers of eligible voters from the polls, hitting all Americans, but placing special burdens on racial minorities, poor people, and young and old voters. [read post]
3 May 2007, 2:08 pm
LBE had written on May 2:There is no doubt that the Supreme Court decision lowered the burden for challenging a patent claim through obviousness under 35 USC 103. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:43 pm
Silence as Evidence of Juror Rehabilitation The Supreme Court of the State of Colorado rendered an opinion in People v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 9:12 am
Pixley v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 2:49 pm
One of the many ways EFF is fighting illegal NSA spying is in our lawsuit First Unitarian Church v. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 10:48 am
Although our crystal ball is cloudy, we're calling Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 3:54 am
People v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:01 am
It may be easy for some people to think that weekly savings of less than $2 are no burden. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 9:00 am
* United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 9:04 am
While the state argued in the district court that "it is common knowledge that people that do not eat or drink for a day are still able to produce urine," the state does not advance that argument on appeal.Since Holland has shown that the hard-and-fast three-hour window substantially burdens his religious practices, to win the case, the state has to show that its policy is "reasonably related to legitimate penological interests," a lenient standard adopted by… [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 5:05 am
Nike v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 10:00 pm
On April 29, 2016, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals released its opinion in Leesburg Yarn Mills, Inc v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 11:46 am
Case citation: State v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 8:28 am
Law-making authorities in almost all civilizations have recognized that the crush of financial burdens causes people to agree to almost any conditions of the lender and consent to even the most improvident loans. [read post]
