Search for: "People v. Case"
Results 601 - 620
of 52,269
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2012, 12:23 pm
When you read old cases -- and I mean, really old cases, like from the early 1800s -- you're often struck by how oddness of the reasoning. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:12 pm
Since then, he's been committed, and the government wants to keep him there, now and (presumably) forever.It'd be an easy case if he was still completely crazy; if he was assaulting people, or throwing things, or refusing to take his medication, etc. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 4:49 pm
The Court of Appeal says: "[I]n this case, the People have made no attempt to show that section 2076 directly and materially advances the state’s substantial interests. . . . [read post]
13 Oct 2024, 10:00 pm
by Whitney Gravelle, Lindsay Bailey, Tamara Morgenthau and Marco Simons Series on Native Sovereignty in U.S Supreme Court Cases On Indigenous Peoples’ Day, Reflections on Tribal Sovereignty in Haaland v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 4:43 am
Background The Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014 received Royal Assent on 27 March 2014. [read post]
22 May 2018, 8:51 pm
People v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 9:27 am
A few more "re-listed" criminal cases for a second consideration by the Supreme Court.Ryan v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 10:34 am
It's a case about illegal lobster fishing on the Ocean Beach Pier. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 9:37 am
June 23, 2011), we can’t comment on the case.But some other people have. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 12:26 pm
" And murder -- even second-degree murder -- is a sufficiently serious charge that we definitely want to get the standard right, and not convict someone of murder who wouldn't be guilty of that very serious offense in a different appellate division or in front of a different panel in the Court of Appeal.So this is one of those cases where the California Supreme Court needs to take the case up and decide once and for all what the right rule should be. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 8:12 am
Gagnier, Case No. 139735, and People v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 9:53 am
Two different murder cases. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 12:25 pm
[Post by Venkat] People v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:54 am
The Alamo it was not when the US Supreme Court (motto: "Not political unless it's abortion or gun rights") heard the case of US v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 1:25 pm
So here's my attempt to get help: The CIA train on and hurt good people here in San Diego, CA. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:31 pm
The price is too high.Now, in this particular case, I agree that the failure to provide post-seizure notice in the particular manner required by state law doesn't require suppression or invalidation of the conviction. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:40 pm
Here is the abstract: One of the United States Supreme Court’s “high profile” cases this Term was “the GPS case,” United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 9:27 am
Such was the case in Kerson v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 5:38 pm
(Full disclosure: I am lead counsel in one of the cases, State v. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 6:30 pm
Google GC Kent Walker: "People are treating patents like lottery tickets" Q: What does the Oracle v. [read post]
