Search for: "People v. District Court of State" Results 601 - 620 of 14,694
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
District Court for the Western District of Texas ruled that a Texas law requiring age-verification and warning labels about the alleged dangers of porn contravenes the First Amendment. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:58 am by Eugene Volokh
People will be particularly concerned about accessing controversial speech when the state government can log and track that access. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 12:55 pm by Eugene Volokh
The truth is that it will look almost the same as other determinations we ask district courts to make every day. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 5:55 am by Patrick C. Toomey
Representative, and a state court judge; and even members of the public invited to the FBI’s Citizens Academy. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
The statute covers a very wide variety of federal officers and people acting under the direction of federal officers–including elected officials, federal civil employees, federal law enforcement officers, judges, postal workers, military officers, and more. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 9:13 am by Eric Goldman
However, that opinion was from a district court in the Fifth Circuit, and this lawsuit is in the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm by admin
We are 30-plus years into the “Daubert” era, in which federal district courts are charged with gatekeeping the relevance and reliability of scientific evidence. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 11:31 am by Eugene Volokh
" The court rejected an interpretation of section 230 in its prior decision in Zango, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
"When anyone – local or foreign, invokes the potential power and authority of a United States District Court, the public has a legitimate right to know on whose behalf their institutions are being used, unless good cause to do otherwise is shown. [read post]