Search for: "People v. Hamilton" Results 601 - 620 of 839
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2011, 9:36 am by Alfred Brophy
 He quotes Kramer's discussion of the 1958 decision in Cooper v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 9:45 pm by Jeff Gamso
 Because "We the people" (or at least the white male property owners) adopted it. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
After all, if the People don't like how the Court has construed a statute, their representatives in Congress can always change the statute. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  (The Supreme Court, of course, paid absolutely no attention to Hamilton’s assurances in deciding in July that electors could actually be turned into mindless minions of whoever voted them into office, the one example at the national leve [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Even Hamilton, sincerely or not, presented this by way of trying to assuage his opponents’ fears of the forthcoming constitutional order. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 1:37 pm by Benjamin Wittes
As Alexander Hamilton explained in the Federalist Papers, “Of all the cares or concerns of government, the direction of war most peculiarly demands those qualities which distinguish the exercise of power by a single hand. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 4:30 am by INFORRM
  It appeared to remain the law that where a conclusion was “objectively verifiable” it was not defensible as comment (although reconciling Hamilton v Clifford [2004] EWHC 1542 (QB) and British Chiropractic Association v Singh [2010] EWCA Civ 350 is not straight forward on this). [read post]
10 Aug 2013, 1:27 pm by Jeffrey Tignor
In 1954, Charles Hamilton Houston and two of his fellow alums from the M Street School, Dunbar’s forerunner, were key members of the team that successfully argued for outlawing legally segregated schools in the states in Brown v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am by Jed Handelsman Shugerman
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Seila Law v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
In the Barnett/Blackman constitutional law casebook, we included this introduction to United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
On 15 January 2020, Nicol J will heard the trial in the case of Dyson v Associated Newspapers. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:55 am by Tess Bridgeman
Joseph Votel (January 29, 2024) The Just Security Podcast: ICJ Provisional Measures in South Africa v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 12:56 pm by Frank Pasquale
Overall, placebos were 82 percent as effective as the drugs, as measured by the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D), a widely used score of symptoms of depression. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 1:31 pm by JB
It was also addressed by the doctrine of Swift v. [read post]