Search for: "People v. Jacobs" Results 601 - 620 of 705
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2010, 3:43 pm
At para.15 of his judgment Sedley LJ quotes him:"In Vodafone v Orange [1997] FSR 34 Jacob J, invited by consent to find the single meaning of words sued on for malicious falsehood, said:"As a comparative stranger to this branch of the law I find the "one meaning rule" strange, particularly for malicious falsehood. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 10:32 am by Jeff Gamso
  She did or did not murder her 4-year-old son, Jacob. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 3:56 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
 In the police interrogation context, many people are simply not inclined to do so thus, our Miranda rights may have less meaning under the hot lights of persistent, aggressive and skillful police interrogation.info@clarkstonlegal.comwww.clarkstonlegal.com [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 5:19 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 In the police interrogation context, many people are simply not inclined to do so thus, our Miranda rights may have less meaning under the hot lights of persistent, aggressive and skillful police interrogation.info@clarkstonlegal.comwww.clarkstonlegal.com [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:19 am
He can do no better than to bring to the attention of his readers the words delivered by Lord Justice Jacob this morning: "3. [read post]
5 May 2010, 1:14 pm by Daniel Clement
In a very narrow ruling, the Court in the case Debra H. v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 1:14 pm
In a very narrow ruling, the Court in the case Debra H. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 1:29 pm by SOIssues
Since that decision, the US Supreme Court has only made one single ruling against any sex offender laws; the Kennedy v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 9:09 am by ngarnett
   For more on this argument, see this interesting article on city v. suburban fortunes in the current recession. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 2:00 pm by charonqc
It’s about time people realised just how arrogant and exploitative the Magic Circle firms really are. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:47 am by Eugene Volokh
Judge Porteous also engaged in corrupt conduct after the Lifemark v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 2:02 pm
Take for instance the "Anywayup Cup" case, Haberman v Jackel International [1999] FSR 683. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 2:27 pm
The latest chapter of the “Brand Owners v Counterfeiters” saga seems again to be playing out in favour of brand owners, with last week’s decision of a Paris District Court holding eBay responsible for facilitating the sale of counterfeit Louis Vuitton products. [read post]