Search for: "People v. Jefferson"
Results 601 - 620
of 830
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2011, 4:05 pm
Ojo, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:38 am
Circuit decision in Oberwetter v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 7:56 pm
" People who use the cloud will deserve what they get (and that would be screwed. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:49 pm
Most people means most plaintiffs. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 4:11 pm
See generally, e.g., People v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 9:26 am
He also strongly supported the Pullman Railroad Strike of 1894, led by Eugene V. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 9:53 am
Jefferson Powell in the Eleventh Circuit on behalf of Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:21 pm
CRA’s are sometimes sued, either by issuers for giving bad ratings (Jefferson Cty. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 3:56 pm
Barnes v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 1:51 pm
See, e.g., Jefferson Cty. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 1:51 pm
See, e.g., Jefferson Cty. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 10:55 am
The Michigan Supreme Court denied 1 motion to waive fees, 159 applications for leave to appeal, 16 motions for reconsideration, and directed the Tuscola County Prosecuting Attorney to respond to Defendant-Appellant’s application for leave to appeal in People v Jefferson. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
Briefly, courts have adopted the learned intermediary rule because:Warnings go to physicians because they are the only people who know both a particular patient’s medical history as well as the risk/benefit profile of the drug/device being prescribed.Limiting warning duties to physicians makes the common law consistent with warning duties imposed by the FDA.Routing prescription drug/device information through the doctor preserves the physician/patient relationship from outside… [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 11:56 am
Jefferson, Bruce Kabengi, Nadine Liu, J. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:22 am
" --William Howard Taft during his time as Chief Justice (taken from Balzac v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 9:20 am
In Smith v. [read post]
BECAUSE WE HAVE THE POWER TO FUCK OUR CLIENTS - The Jefferson Parish Indigent Defender Board Edition
1 Feb 2011, 1:45 pm
Oklahoma City and Mayer v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 6:20 pm
(p. 60) In light of [United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 8:30 pm
" Marshall was correct in McCulloch v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 6:13 am
"* See The Constitution of the United States of America, U.S.G.P.O., Page 1035, Footnote 2.** Cooper v Aaron, 358 US 1, 18-19, [1958]. [read post]
