Search for: "People v. Kerr"
Results 601 - 620
of 729
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2010, 11:23 am
Karo and United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:07 am
Via Orin Kerr at VC: On August 19th, Justice Kennedy gave an address that included an interesting passing remark about the role of blogs. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 11:46 pm
(Orin Kerr) A few federal court opinions have been making a big public splash recently by taking surprising positions on how the Fourth Amendment applies to location surveillance. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 8:13 pm
(Orin Kerr) The case is Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 5:51 pm
But that’s a decision based on values that requires picking the least bad of the options, and of course different people will disagree on those values. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 5:29 am
I was reminded of this when reading about McKenna v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 2:48 am
Over at Volokh Conspiracy, lawprof Orin Kerr posts about the 6th Circuit decision in McKenna v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 8:45 pm
The case, McKenna v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
Lujan v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 11:00 am
Kerr dissed the D.C. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:43 pm
Evans and Lawrence v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 8:15 pm
See People v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 11:46 am
(Orin Kerr) Today the D.C. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 12:29 pm
Griggs-Ryan v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 6:24 am
Duffy summarizes that opinion, which Orin Kerr excerpts at the Volokh Conspiracy. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:48 am
R (Smith) v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor [2010] UKSC 29 JUDGMENT The Supreme Court allowed the appeal on the jurisdiction issue (Lady Hale, Lord Mance and Lord Kerr dissenting) and unanimously dismissed the appeal on the inquest issue. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 4:00 am
ACLU v Mukasey 534 F.3d.181 (3d Circ. 2008). [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol 1 v) the… [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol 1 v) the… [read post]
31 May 2010, 6:10 pm
The court in United States v. [read post]
