Search for: "People v. Lawrence"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,254
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2009, 8:22 am
Zimmerman v Wabaunsee County. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 7:30 am
Lawrence Koplow [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 8:45 am
The second argument demonstrates that even in the absence of criminal penalties, prohibition of marijuana use violates a moral right to exercise autonomy in personal matters - a corollary to Mill's harm principle in the utilitarian tradition, or, in the non-consequentialist tradition, to the respect for personhood that was well described by the Supreme Court in its recent Lawrence v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:47 pm
*The irony is that, under the last administration, Chuck Rosenthal set Curry aside to argue before the Supreme Court in Lawrence v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 3:59 pm
In Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 4:41 am
"(emphasis added)In other words, creativity v. control.J.K. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 9:13 am
The driver of the Chevy pickup that struck Ray, 50-year-old Robert V. [read post]
21 May 2008, 7:33 pm
The AP reports: It's the first appeals court ruling in the country that evaluates "don't ask, don't tell" in light of Lawrence v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 6:59 am
Aynes, “Bradwell v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 9:31 am
The ruling in Coleman v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 10:30 am
Casey (1992) and Lawrence v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
Board overruled Plessy v. [read post]
26 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Justice Kennedy’s opinion reads much like his opinion in Lawrence v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:07 pm
Evans and Lawrence v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 2:30 pm
Texas, Obergefell v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 2:30 pm
Texas, Obergefell v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 1:36 pm
In Lawrence v. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 12:27 pm
Board and Lawrence v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:00 am
See Lawrence v. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 10:28 am
As a fan of relationship (see all that marriage stuff), I am not as outraged by this language as many of the progressive critiques of it, though I also see no good reason for the law to bar fully consensual, non-dangerous non-relationship sex (which, if it was sexual at all, is apparently what the encounter in Lawrence v. [read post]
