Search for: "People v. Part"
Results 601 - 620
of 25,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2017, 3:09 am
Please see Part One here. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 12:04 pm
(The Court of Appeal dropped a one-sentence footnote that says that maybe Gonzalez was the shooter, but this seems an implausible reading of the facts, and in any event centrally holds that he was properly convicted of aiding and abetting even without being the shooter, and this is the part I have the most problems with.)I'm not saying this one's clear cut. [read post]
21 May 2009, 10:11 am
She's won three cases, in whole or in part, in which the Attorney General has admitted that the defendant was entitled to relief. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 3:17 pm
There are parallels between aspects of it and Joseph Conrad's novella Heart of Darkness: cruelty, the abandonment of civilized norms, and apparent madness; remote locations that discouraged outside investigation; and arranged displays of severed heads.In 2008, responding to a neighbor's complaint, Santa Cruz County Animal Services Authority employees and sheriff's deputies visited defendant's property, located deep in the woods in a remote part of Santa Cruz County. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:45 pm
So this is a central part of the trial.So what does the Court of Appeal do? [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:01 am
In Arista v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 9:50 am
But the federal common law that people fight about today normally displaces state law to the contrary. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 5:30 am
You can read Parts I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, and VIII.] [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 7:07 am
Fort Myerscar accident lawyers recognize part of the problem has to do with the fact that motor vehicles are among the most fluid assets people own. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 7:17 am
In Julin v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 2:05 pm
The Supreme Court yesterday decided Town of Greece v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 3:17 pm
For her part, Laura argued that they were not mistaken at all in 2006, because the account did exist then. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 8:44 pm
DOJ (9th Cir.) -- affirming in part and reversing in part district court's decision and ruling that only portions of internal guidance for prosecutors was exempt as attorney work product and that none of disputed records were protected by Exemption 7(E).People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 8:44 pm
DOJ (9th Cir.) -- affirming in part and reversing in part district court's decision and ruling that only portions of internal guidance for prosecutors was exempt as attorney work product and that none of disputed records were protected by Exemption 7(E).People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
The California Supreme Court had a precedent from 2011, People v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 7:51 am
The case of Carmer v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 4:26 pm
It doesn't seem much challenged.But the rationale and statutory interpretation part; that part seems both unnecessary as well as unwise and unsound.Better to have just gone with the narrowest way of resolving this case; namely, that the award here was reasonable. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 2:03 pm
" You can read the whole thing for yourself if you'd like, but here's the most depressing/disturbing part -- the part that made me speak to myself out loud. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 2:47 pm
Jameson v. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 5:59 pm
Property of the People v. [read post]
