Search for: "People v. Phillips" Results 601 - 620 of 915
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2011, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
On Monday 28 and Tuesday 29 November 2011 the Court of Appeal (Lord Judge LCJ, Lord Neuberger MR and Maurice Kay LJ) heard the appeals in Phillips v NGN and Coogan v NGN against orders of Mr Justice Vos in phone hacking claims (see [2011] EWHC 349 (Ch)). [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 5:51 am by brooks
Phillips understands the role of the civil justice system in deterring bad behavior. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
“There already is a rather strong regulation against hacking people’s telephones – the law. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
We have had previous posts on the cases of Robins v Kordowski [2011] EWHC 981 (QB)) (seehere), Awdry, Bailey and Douglas v Kordowksi, Farrall v Kordowksi [2010] EWHC 2436 (QB) (see here), Phillips v Kordowski and Mazzola v Kordowski. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 12:28 pm by Hopkins
Based upon my own research and the below discussion, I must conclude that, more likely than not, the jurors in the case of Hunter v Phillip Morris resulted in a less than full disclosure of the evidence relating to the outrageous conduct of the tobacco industry. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 12:28 pm by Hopkins
Based upon my own research and the below discussion, I must conclude that, more likely than not, the jurors in the case of Hunter v Phillip Morris resulted in a less than full disclosure of the evidence relating to the outrageous conduct of the tobacco industry. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 12:26 am by INFORRM
   We have had previous posts on the cases of Robins v Kordowski [2011] EWHC 981 (QB)) (see here), Awdry, Bailey and Douglas v Kordowksi, Farrall v Kordowksi [2010] EWHC 2436 (QB) (see here), Phillips v Kordowski and Mazzola v Kordowski. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 12:53 am by Melina Padron
The Act prescribes the right of people in Scotland to claim damages for an asbestos-related condition. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 6:41 am by Charon QC
@legalbizzle on his blog writes:The Angry Pencil: a pathology of customer complaints “There are people who can’t let a bandwagon go unjumped on. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 5:22 am by SHG
To my mind, the case is really a follow-up to Atwater v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 9:10 am by Lyle Denniston
  But where five Justices might draw the line was entirely unpredictable after the hearing on Florence v. [read post]