Search for: "People v. Powers"
Results 601 - 620
of 15,252
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2016, 6:52 pm
In the case of Dietz v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
But Peoples points to a 2017 Supreme Court ruling, Peckingham v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 11:28 am
Holding that being a landowner is indeed "membership in a particular social group" that may potentially entitle someone to asylum.You don't typically think of Judge Reinhardt as a protector of the rich and powerful. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 7:35 am
Smith v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 10:53 pm
” Ellingham v. [read post]
20 Nov 2024, 10:59 am
Trans people deserve the freedom to be who we are. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 11:00 am
"The Power of the Powerless," pt. 1, sect. 17, Living in Truth (1986). [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 1:31 pm
The reference is eBay France v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 11:50 am
If fully informed, I think most people would agree with the 1989 rule of Penry v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 1:54 am
The list includes people such as Liu Shaoqi who was the second most powerful communist leader in China at the time of the Cultural Revolution and Deng Xiaoping, also one of the most powerful leaders in China and a dedicated communist. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 3:06 pm
As the Chief Justice concluded: Speech is powerful. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 5:07 pm
Criminal Law & Procedure, Sentencing The People v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 3:47 pm
In American Electric Power Co. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
SeeEisner v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 5:38 pm
As the Court explained"Reversal [of that conviction and dismissal of the ninth count] is required because the jury may have convicted defendant of an unindicted [attempted murder], resulting in the usurpation by the prosecutor of the exclusive power of the [g]rand [j]ury to determine the charges" (People v McNab, 167 AD2d 858, 858; see People v Comfort, 31 AD3d 1110, 1111, lv denied 7 NY3d 847). [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 6:40 am
Rather, the hope is that the insincere use of democratic and human-rights-respecting rhetoric by autocrats raises expectations in the people, who eventually demand the real thing from their leaders. [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:10 pm
In Dobbs v. [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 6:20 pm
Non-disclosure agreements are inconsistent with the policy when they prevent speech on matters of vital public interest solely because that speech may place powerful people in a bad light. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 11:08 am
Case citation: Greer v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 7:34 am
In the case of Hibshman v. [read post]
