Search for: "People v. Short"
Results 601 - 620
of 8,448
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2014, 5:45 am
Four years ago people advocating the abolition of software patents made a lot of noise, including a movie named Patent Absurdity, about a case pending then before the Supreme Court of the United States: Bilski v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Earlier this month, in Town of Greece v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 6:35 am
Duraflame, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 10:14 am
Samsung v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:33 pm
The question was whether to overrule the decades-old precedent Nevada v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 4:24 am
Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 8:15 am
Magistrate Judge Denlow held a status hearing yesterday morning in the USA v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 3:16 pm
People v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 12:33 pm
Merck] trial, [Judge] Pisano ruled on March 8 [2013] that Merck couldn’t block testimony or evidence about the short-term effectiveness of Fosamax. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 7:37 am
Most FOSTA opinions are lengthy, but this one was short because the law was quite clear. [read post]
17 May 2012, 8:47 am
See Commonwealth v. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 2:27 pm
My sense is that the people at issue are maybe Chaldean, of which there's a fairly substantial community down here. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 12:30 pm
[Heated depositions, wellness checks, and strip searches. ] Please enjoy the latest edition of Short Circuit, a weekly feature written by a bunch of people at the Institute for Justice. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 1:31 pm
Florida and Graham v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 12:57 am
The conduct had no ramifications beyond the three people who were affected by it. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:55 am
In 2005, Succar v. [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 2:47 pm
Download the case at: Ohio State Bar Association v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 2:54 pm
Today the New Jersey Senate came up short in the vote on a pending marriage equality bill. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 3:04 am
” [John Ross, Short Circuit, on PETA v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 3:04 am
R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State (No.2) [2011] EWCA Civ 639 is one that we may have missed when it first came out (or we decided not to do it – we can’t quite remember now), but, given that I have some free time this morning, I thought I’d do a short note on it. [read post]
