Search for: "People v. Wear"
Results 601 - 620
of 2,634
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2010, 6:37 am
See Sacks v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 10:27 am
I know many of the people in the claim through blogging – they are leading US law bloggers – and I have had the pleasure of podcasting with several of them. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 1:24 pm
Said Beyond Retro, given the similarity of the marks and the fact that both were for clothing in Class 25, there was bound to be a likelihood of confusion among the relevant class of consumers [presumably people in Europe who wear clothes, guesses Merpel, who is greatly attached to her own fur coat but wears nothing underneath]. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 7:29 pm
Do I use a half-sleeve dress that you can’t wear? [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 5:05 am
A decision in 1939, United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 4:30 am
(Young people wear out artificial joints more quickly than older people, they said.). [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
In a more recent case, Lujan v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 1:55 pm
The California Court of Appeal took a different view in People v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 3:01 pm
(May 15, 2013) [2] Fraley v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 3:44 pm
Given Jacobson v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 11:10 am
Given Jacobson v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 10:32 am
The Oregon Supreme Court unanimously held this in yesterday’s State v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 4:03 am
On the first of this month, the Michigan Court of Appeals issued a useful decision, People v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 12:48 pm
Each person on a personal watercraft must wear a US Coast Guard-approved Type I, II, III or V personal flotation device. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 11:44 am
The sweatpants Liebeck was wearing absorbed the coffee and held it next to her skin. [read post]
3 Sep 2007, 9:36 am
In The Follieri Group LLC v . [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 11:09 am
Making news in the main stream media is A.B. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 2:59 am
In People v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:26 pm
We should keep in mind that people in prison for extended stays are generally people who have committed major violations of the rights of others. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 7:23 am
The question then becomes when these comments will allow you to take the case to a jury.The case is Wesley-Dickson v. [read post]
