Search for: "Perez v. Doe "
Results 601 - 620
of 889
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
Where goods were first manufactured overseas, however, courts have been virtually unanimous in holding that the first sale doctrine does not apply — I’ve only been able to find one case in the past 30 years that has held otherwise. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 8:40 pm
Amazon v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 9:59 am
See, for example, Campbell v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 9:35 am
” While Perry v Perez may not have been the right vehicle for doing so, the Court now has before it not one but two excellent vehicles to use for a reconsideration of the modern VRA: the cert. petitions in Nix v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 6:19 am
Does that make me a bad person? [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 2:30 pm
For example, in Pacific Merchant Shipping Association v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 11:34 am
Manalapan Realty, L.P. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
In applying the OML, the courts construe its provisions liberally in accordance with its stated purposes (see Perez, 5 NY3d at 528; Gordon v Village of Monticello, 87 NY2d 124, 127 [1995]; Encore Coll. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 8:41 am
A close second is Perez v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 4:30 am
And what does the learned intermediary doctrine have to say about that? [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 10:23 am
Thirty years ago this week, the high court ruled in Plyler v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:35 pm
Saenz, president and general counsel of MALDEF, which led the fight in Plyler v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 8:55 pm
This hierarchical intervention creates an agency problem that does not receive sufficient attention in the open government discourse. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:31 am
William Perez, Revisions to the Offer in Compromise Program Anthony Nitti: And Then There Were Two: Obama v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 8:14 am
Doe, the case that ensured equal access to public education to all children, regardless of their citizenship or immigration status. [read post]
29 May 2012, 12:21 pm
It will feature keynote addresses from both Assistant Attorney General Tom Perez and Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights Russlynn Ali. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:05 am
Sarmiento-Perez, 724 F.2d 898, 900 (11th Cir. 1984). [read post]
18 May 2012, 6:57 pm
While it may be argued that by appointing an arbitrator the order implicitly compels the parties to arbitration, the order does not explicitly grant Perez's motion to compel and does not explicitly compel the parties to arbitrate their dispute. [read post]
18 May 2012, 6:57 pm
While it may be argued that by appointing an arbitrator the order implicitly compels the parties to arbitration, the order does not explicitly grant Perez's motion to compel and does not explicitly compel the parties to arbitrate their dispute. [read post]
11 May 2012, 9:48 am
So he's surprised and disappointed that it's come to this.USA v. [read post]
