Search for: "Power Enterprises, Inc."
Results 601 - 620
of 1,311
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2016, 2:40 pm
Noting that the exclusion applies to “tangible personal property,” and the sales tax regulation interpreting the exclusion provides that whether materials are further processed or simply used in the processing activity will depend entirely upon an analysis of the “end product,” the court reasoned that it found nothing in the law that requires the “end product” be the enterprise’s primary product, explaining: “The plain language of the… [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:40 am
In effect, the enterprise was both complying with law and exercising its rights--to the full--to contest efforts to force it to admit to environmental breaches. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 6:03 am
The Commission pointed out that Free Enterprise specifically did not address ALJs. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 6:55 am
Enterprises, Inc., supra. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 12:44 pm
Defendant is Somero Enterprises, Inc. of Houghton, Michigan. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 10:00 pm
Chamber of Commerce, the National Association of Manufacturers, and numerous other business and enterprise groups have taken up the DeCosters’ cause by filing amicus briefs in the case. [read post]
The Canadian Copyright Board: To Be or Not To Be –That Is A Question – ALAI Conference, May 25, 2016
28 Jun 2016, 2:37 pm
This was evident in the response of Jason Kee of Google and others who spoke for powerful interests, who emphasized that new technology moves very quickly and delay and retroactivity are serious concerns, even for an enterprise as powerful as Google. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 10:08 pm
The Defendant conducts a sophisticated commercial enterprise with the same bargaining power as the Plaintiff. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 6:19 am
The paper thus ends with a brief view toward application — what does all this theory mean for the way states and enterprises ought to act, that is ought to perform their constitutional roles in the world in which they occupy substantial positions of power over individuals, who now appear dwarfed by these institutional giants. 1. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 12:29 pm
Roberts Jr. announces that Alito “also has our opinion in Number 15-138, RJR Nabisco Inc. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 10:41 am
Inter-Chem Coal Co., Inc., 41 F.3d 567, 570 (10th Cir. 1994)). [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am
Nation Enterprises, 471 U.S. 539, 556 (1985). [read post]
4 Jun 2016, 8:23 am
In addition to the shareholders and board of directors, Chinese private corporations also have a board of supervisors with some significant power. [read post]
25 May 2016, 2:44 pm
The partnership agreement gave each partner full power of management and control of the operation of the business by unanimous consent. [read post]
25 May 2016, 2:44 pm
The partnership agreement gave each partner full power of management and control of the operation of the business by unanimous consent. [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:23 pm
CACI Premier Technology, Inc. [read post]
16 May 2016, 10:39 am
In the United States, there is, of course Feist Publication, Inc. v Rural Telephone Service Company, on telephone directories, and Victor Lalli Enterprises, Inc. v Big Red Apple, Inc. [read post]
10 May 2016, 4:21 pm
Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, Inc., 845 A.2d 1031 (Del. 2004)] is similar to that articulated by the American Law Institute (ALI) in its Principles of Corporate Governance ¶ 7.01 and provides that the court must look to the nature of the wrong, to whom the relief should go, the independence of the direct injury to any injury to the company, and that the plaintiff can show that the duty breached was owed to the plaintiff and that the plaintiff can prevail without showing a harm to… [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am
[emphasis added] While most search engines are commercial enterprises and supported by advertising revenue, it does not charge users for search results and it does not charge content providers to be indexed in the search engine for inclusion in search results. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 8:27 am
” (emphasis added) The detention powers required by Article 17.86 already exist in Section 53 of the Trade-marks Act and are not exercised by customs officers.[2] Geist also claims that Canada caved to U.S. demands that Canada agree to expand the powers of customs officers to initiate border measures for goods that are in-transit (i.e., not destinated to stay within the country). [read post]
