Search for: "Powers v. Commonwealth"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,069
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2018, 12:33 pm
This is kind of ridiculous even without the Roman numerals (though I could give you about XCIV reasons why you shouldn’t go above V with those). [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 1:12 pm
The Future Fund will make provision for unfunded superannuation liabilities that will become payable during a period when an ageing population is likely to place significant pressure on the Commonwealth’s finances." [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 2:26 pm
The case is Puerto Rico v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 2:26 pm
The case is Puerto Rico v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 2:26 pm
The case is Puerto Rico v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 8:42 am
(Filed by a university employer and two individuals.)The petition not distributed to the Justices is Commonwealth of Virginia, et al., v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 3:33 pm
(See City of Ladue v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 2:40 pm
At any rate, the recent decision in Commonwealth of Virginia v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 6:43 am
Quoting from Commonwealth v. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 1:10 pm
This past week, however, in Commonwealth v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 12:42 pm
Trump for President, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 6:47 am
No, the Supreme Court of Virginia ruled in the case of Gilliam v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
It represents a shifting of coercive power from the external-the state, the police, and the institution to the internal-the individual and the private. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 12:41 pm
Essentially, I agree with V. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 10:50 pm
Carroll v. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 4:47 pm
The legitimate invocation of the Court’s power contained in s106B to set aside the identified dispositions of money from the husband to his mother, if the preconditions for the exercise of such power are satisfied, is sufficient context within which to determine the disputed question of joinder, in my judgment. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:41 am
Blakely v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 7:52 am
Incidentally, the apex Court in African Reinsurance Corporation v. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 12:05 pm
Instead, it means that the question is whether the government has the power to disable the exercise of a right that they otherwise possess. [read post]
