Search for: "Powers v. Taylor" Results 601 - 620 of 874
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2022, 2:25 pm by Matt Gluck
  Adam Chan described the Supreme Court’s ruling in Torres v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 7:00 am by ACLU
Reproductive rights remain under attack and the struggle for gender equal medical care is ongoing — as further illustrated in the Supreme Court’s most recent ruling in Trump v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 4:30 am by Karen Tani
Howell Williams, Western Connecticut State University, “Workers Built Danbury: Deindustrialized Memory in a Hatting Town”Josh Kluever, Binghamton University (SUNY), “Sorry Waldman, We Just Couldn’t Help It: Socialist State Legislators in New York, 1912-1922”CARCERAL STATE, CARCERAL SOCIETYModerator: Elizabeth Hinton, Yale University Panelists: Max Felker-Kantor, Ball State University, “Arresting the Demand for Drugs: DARE and the Politics of Supply and Demand… [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:48 pm
We merely held that, because appellant is a sovereign power, the Surrogate's Court could not compel the United States to submit its tax claim to its jurisdiction. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:40 pm
We merely held that, because appellant is a sovereign power, the Surrogate's Court could not compel the United States to submit its tax claim to its jurisdiction. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 2:13 am by Keith Mallinson
While Taylor Swift sounds and has very different IP ownership to Black Sabbath, CD production of their respective albums is as oblivious and independent of that as is TSMC’s chip foundry to the cellular or video codec SEP ownership and to the implementation of cellular modem designs by MediaTek versus Huawei’s HiSilicon. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:51 am by INFORRM
The philosopher and poet, Samuel Taylor Coleridge (1772-1834), cautioned strongly that visuocentrism is problematic. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 3:32 pm by Nathan Sheard
” A year ago, EFF’s Executive Director, Cindy Cohn, shared these words in EFF's statement about the police killings of Breonna Taylor and George Floyd. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:29 am by Eleonora Rosati
The burden is therefore placed on the courts to triage these issues for the time being with the definitive outcome of Getty Images v Stability AI being eagerly awaited.Turning to training, a different perspective was offered from the current state of law within the European Union. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 12:36 am by David Smith
Most landlords will be oblivious to this after Spencer v Taylor but my interest in this case is well known to be excessive! [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Moreover, the SROs, in their regulatory function, are users of the CAT, so they, like the Commission, have less interest in constraining the CAT’s power as a regulatory tool. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 3:26 pm by Aaron Moss
Will folks ever get tired of suing Taylor Swift over ridiculous copyright claims? [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 7:58 am by charonqc
  How not to do a TV interview Zac v Snow The silly season starts soon. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:53 pm by INFORRM
It was also announced that the case of Taylor v Associated Newspapers (incidentally based on an article by, Charles Sale, the same Mail journalist as the Kenyon case) had settled and the jury trial which had been last week did not take place. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
Taylor to apply the automatic reversal rule in Holloway v. [read post]