Search for: "Powers v. Taylor"
Results 601 - 620
of 874
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2011, 11:17 am
The Ninth Circuit takes a stab at this question in Taylor v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 4:21 pm
In a recent case, Taylor v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 12:08 pm
Taylor v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 7:42 am
Taylor, 197 A.D.2d 858, 859 (1993). [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:17 am
Telford Taylor, the chief NMT prosecutor, came to think of the trial program as a failure. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:37 pm
Co. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 4:59 pm
M.B.Z. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 2:05 pm
That request, noted yesterday on the Court’s docket for the case of Fisher v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 6:33 am
Today in the Community we are discussing Arizona v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 10:45 am
Standard works (Kennedy's CIF Contracts) and decisions [Johnson v Taylor Bros (1920) AC 144, 155] recognise the following as features of CIF contractsCIF contracts relate to carriage of goods by sea. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 6:41 am
Matthew Taylor also considers the riots appeals: Riot sentencing – Appeal Judgement Bystander JP of The Magistrates’s Blog writes about sense of relief on the riot cases appeal: Decision From The Top Carl Gardner over at Head of Legal is always a good read. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 4:16 am
(Patents Post-Grant) AUTM survey shows significant increases in university patent filings and issuances in FY2010 (Patent Docs) Pending Supreme Court and en banc Federal Circuit patent cases (Patently-O) US Patents – Decisions Shift in grounds of USPTO reexamination rejection examined by CAFC: In re Stepan Company (Patents Post-Grant) (IPBiz) CAFC tackles “consisting of” in In re Taylor (IPBiz) Federal Circuit affirms limits on using litigation expenses to meet… [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Lane (1989) and Griffith v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 5:20 am
Last week's AIPPI UK event, kindly hosted in the smart new London office of Taylor Wessing, was entitled "Are you sitting comfortably? [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 11:17 am
St Marylebone Property Co [1962] 2 WLR 1020 : [1962] 2 All ER 288 can be considered where House of Lords referring to Taylor v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:25 am
: 09-076/09-090/09-091 Superior Fine Papers Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 4:28 am
An entity not a party to a collective bargaining agreement negotiated pursuant to the Taylor Law may not be bound by its termsMatter of Council of School Supervisors & Adm'rs, Local 1 v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2011 NY Slip Op 06451, Appellate Division, First Department The Council filed a contract grievance in response to a city-wide plan applicable to all city agencies that reduced the number of parking permits issued to municipal workers for parking on city… [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:54 am
Interpreting the provisions of a collective bargaining agreement Chemung County v CSEA, 277 A.D.2d 792 The Chemung County case makes the point that a Taylor Law agreement may contain a clause that could become a "landmine" if ignored by the arbitrator and ultimately result in a court's vacating an arbitration award issued pursuant to the agreement's "contract arbitration clause. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm
” Taylor v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm
” Taylor v. [read post]
