Search for: "Price v. Illinois" Results 601 - 620 of 1,036
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2019, 5:00 am by John Jascob
The argument that the spoof orders could not be fraudulent because they were executable and subject to market risk was rejected in the Seventh Circuit’s landmark decision in U.S. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 10:01 pm by Kelly
(Spicy IP) India: NPPA proposes controlling the price of cancer drugs (Spicy IP) India: Requiem for a dream? [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 8:43 am by Sheppard Mullin
Fortunately, the Delaware Chancery Court recently issued a decision, entitled Edgewater Growth Capital Partners, L.P. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 6:43 am by Mala Mason
The Court of Appeals for one district in Ohio recently approved such a sale in Park National Bank v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 3:30 pm by D. Daxton White
Dax White is the managing partner of the White Law Group, a national securities fraud, securities arbitration and investor protection law firm with offices in Chicago Illinois and Vero Beach Florida. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 1:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Price Waterhouse, 84 N.Y.2d 535, 541, 644 N.E.2d 1009, 620 N.Y.S.2d 318 (1994))); Shumsky v. [read post]
29 Sep 2007, 1:19 am
A paper from another panel:Eric Claeys, George Mason University School of LawINS v. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
The Court saw the license denial as an effort by New York to horde a resource and thereby keep prices for its consumers low.Edwards v California (1941) considered a challenge to a California law aimed at reducing the influx of dustbowl indigents to the state. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 12:08 pm by Eugene Volokh
" Illinois precedents are not entirely clear on this (compare Zdeb v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
Beaver, No. 07-1381 "Convictions for participating in a price-fixing conspiracy, and making false statements to a federal law enforcement agent who was investigating that conspiracy, are affirmed over defendant's claims that the government failed to prove at trial that a price-fixing conspiracy existed, that he joined the conspiracy, or that he made false statements. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 3:23 pm by John Elwood
Illinois, antitrust damages claims may be brought by indirect purchasers who do not allege that they paid a price fixed by the alleged conspirators. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 1:13 pm by kwalters
The position is created pursuant to the state constitution, currently at Article V, Section 1 of the 1970 Illinois Constitution. [read post]