Search for: "Price v. United States"
Results 601 - 620
of 5,300
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
10 May 2012, 4:30 am
Mireles v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 10:39 am
The Supreme Court of the United States issued its much-anticipated decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 8:56 am
In May 2005, DSMC petitioned the Commerce Department and the ITC “asserting that certain foreign manufacturers of diamond sawblades were selling their products in the United States at dumped prices. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 9:14 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 1:01 pm
Facts: This case (Sara Hawes v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court—in Hughes v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 12:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 8:17 pm
United, Inc., the Supreme Court has “consistently stated” that “’the immediate buyers from the alleged antitrust violators’ may maintain a suit against the antitrust violators. [read post]
28 May 2008, 12:46 pm
In Harris Assocs. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 10:55 am
State Farm), that means prices will rise to cover risks like the Broussards. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 3:10 pm
The foreign editions are uniformly manufactured outside the United States. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 6:38 am
Nothing binds the United States to the rest of the world, and we need not adhere to the same set of rules that we demand others apply. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 9:32 am
Even among our united States, divorce laws are discordant. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:27 am
Case citation: Martin v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 1:33 pm
United States court case challenging the constitutionality of the ACA and its potential impact on individuals with pre-existing conditions. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am
United States, 12-6355, concerning the proper application of the categorical analysis in Shepard v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 7:26 am
Facts: This case (United States of America v. [read post]
