Search for: "Public Citizen v. Department of Justice" Results 601 - 620 of 1,963
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm by Michael Ehline
The late Justice Antonin Scalia restated the ancient common law rule in Deshaney v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am by centerforartlaw
The European Court of Human Rights in the decision Bayev and others v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
The only remarkable point is that the Justice Department persists in making this argument. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:19 am by Benjamin Wittes
Several weeks later—yesterday, that is—the Justice Department released the Al-Aulaqi targeted killing memorandum (which I summarized here), and the world is aflutter, once again, with discussion of imminence. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 5:52 am
“Merely making someone else’s work available to the public is insufficient”, writes Justice Abella for the majority of four judges. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 12:42 pm by JB
Painter in 1950, and again in the Brown litigation in 1952, and after the Eisenhower Administration's Justice Department concurred with the Truman Administration when it came into office, that the Supreme Court finally felt comfortable overturning Plessy v. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm by Samantha Heavner
Department of Transportation issued a notice of proposed rulemaking aimed at improving accessibility for pedestrians in public right-of-ways. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 5:45 pm by Amy Howe
Abortion coverage by employers The justices sent Roman Catholic Diocese v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
Department of Justice found that 5% of 9,691 sex offenders released from prison were re-arrested for new sex crimes within three years (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2003). [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 8:32 am by Jamie Maclaren
In the recent SCC decision in Canada v Bedford, Chief Justice McLachlin outlined two basic conditions that each permit a lower court to depart from precedent set by a higher court: (1) a new legal issue is raised by the parties or by significant developments in the law; and (2) new circumstances or evidence fundamentally shift the parameters of the debate. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 1:22 am by David Doniger
  As Chief Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes elegantly said in the 1907 a case called Georgia v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 12:12 pm by Nabiha Syed
Lyle Denniston of this blog reports on the Montana Supreme Court’s decision to ban independent corporate spending on state elections, a decision seemingly in conflict with the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]