Search for: "Quick v. United States"
Results 601 - 620
of 2,421
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2017, 12:42 pm
Thus, under United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
Simply put, Section 5 stated that if any jurisdiction wanted to make changes to laws relevant to voting, it first must have that aspiration upheld by the authority of the Attorney General of the United States or a three judge panel of the U.S. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 4:16 am
The district court agreed because there had been no "injury-in-fact" to the United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 8:09 am
By: Gene Quinn (IPWatchdog.com) Last week, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the matter of Bowman v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 5:01 am
Via John Wesley Hall at the Fourth Amendment Blog, courtesy of Liberty and Justice For Y'all, the 5th Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 2:20 pm
I wonder, though, what Jonathan makes of this passage from United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 1:35 pm
And that decision's from no schlub of a court: it's from the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 8:27 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 5:47 pm
June 1, 2020), and the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 3:35 am
United States. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 8:42 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 4:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 12:00 am
Kimble appealed the decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:28 am
Dukes [Supreme Court of the United States] Wal-Mart v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 3:52 am
Alok Gupta (thanks) kindly pointed out the judgment in Om Prakash v. [read post]
31 Dec 1969, 4:00 pm
First, it creates an emergency exception allowing the government to continue targeting “roamers”—people lawfully targeted as non-United States persons located outside the United States, but who suddenly show up in the United States—for a brief period of time after they show up in the United States, so long as “a lapse in the targeting of such non-United States person poses a threat… [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 10:10 am
posts: Quick and dirty re: elected state judges and campaign money. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:10 am
That happened in 2013, when the Court read its decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 9:15 am
Among the tens of thousands of tattooers working in the United States, the tiny handful who have brought copyright infringement claims are rare outliers. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:02 am
Based on this assumption the Court finds that a single family unit is not properly comparable to the unit make up of unrelated disabled residents of a group home. [read post]
