Search for: "R. Gravelle" Results 601 - 615 of 615
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2018, 4:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The Sydney Opera House and the Sydney Harbor Bridge, viewed from the Royal Botanical Gardens in Sydney Over the holidays and in anticipation of my upcoming annual list of the Top Ten D&O stories, I am publishing a series of alternative Top Ten lists. [read post]
23 Oct 2021, 2:40 pm by Joel R. Brandes
“under [his] control financially ... ma[king] her beg him on a weekly basis just for money for food;” Kicking Lazaro in the stomach when she was three-months pregnant with S.L.C. and forcing her to sleep in the closet; Punching and screaming at Lazaro when she was seven-months pregnant, after she sat in the driver’s seat of his car, then throwing her to the ground, dragging her through the gravel, and leaving her on the side of the road for hours; Hitting Lazaro in the… [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 5:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Gravelle, “Depreciation and the Taxation of Real Estate,” Congressional Research Service, Oct. 25, 2000, https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/20001025_RL30163_a546db900d6f08b69003019c922828026e1e4227.pdf. [read post]
Text messaging is a great way to communicate, but beware that when you are texting your drug dealer the person who responds back may just be the police. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 9:33 am
Across a gravel road, rows of mobile homes look as if they haven't left their moorings in decades. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
” But these days, look no further than countless congressional social media accounts and political rallies for R-rated language. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 4:54 pm by Arthur F. Coon
County of Santa Barbara (2013) 213 Cal.App.4th 1059, 1067-1068 [“adverse hydraulic impacts” threshold of significance adopted in County’s EIR to evaluate riverbed sand and gravel mining project was proper and did not need to be “formally adopted” as it was project-specific and not for general use; further, the threshold was clear and unambiguous, and properly distinct from the Appendix G factors and thresholds for hydrological impacts, which were only… [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
The charges date back to incidents in 2005, including allegations that cattle were allowed to stand in a creek on the property, that water from the feedlot was allowed to flow into a creek and that a gravel pit was used as an unpermitted dump. [read post]