Search for: "R. R. D. v. Holder"
Results 601 - 620
of 903
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2013, 8:31 pm
SpicyIP saw a very busy week with many interesting developments -Image from hereThe week started with Sai’s insightful post on Microsoft v Motorola. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:10 am
Instead, the sole ability of the sign to individualise the goods of the IR holder in relation to those offered by its competitors is decisive. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 7:25 pm
This publication opens a two month period of public inquiry and consultation, further to the new Article R. 721-3 IPC. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 6:09 am
Merken BV v Hagelkruis Beheer BV, Case C-149/11 indicates the use needed to support an EU registration, as follows:a) Territorial scope of use is one of the relevant factors;b) It cannot be ruled out that use in a single member state can support an EU registration;c) Use needs to be sufficient or create or maintain a market share;d) No de minimus level of use can be defined.Other factors to consider include the scale and frequency of use, the nature of use, and the nature of the… [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:34 am
Hollinger v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 10:30 am
“Intellectual property crimes are not victimless,” Holder said in a statement. [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WHO members near accord on global strategy on IP and health: (Intellectual Property Watch), (GenericsWeb), (Gowlings), (IAM), Copiepresse seeks up to €49 million from Google in lawsuit over right to feature links to publishers’ content on internet: (IPKat), (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360) Singapore ‘image… [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:40 am
Versa v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 6:09 am
Hasbro, Inc. v. [read post]
Patent office and Qualcomm's litigation tactics render prof's fanboy testimony on patents unreliable
23 Jan 2019, 8:08 am
And with respect to Samsung again, she lumped all of its R&D expenses together, so Mr. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 4:28 am
U.S., No. 02cv10890-NG (D. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 7:10 am
’(R. 77, Day 3 Trial Tr. at 222–23.) [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 10:28 am
Two Pesos, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 3:00 pm
In Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
See Zerbst v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 5:01 am
In State v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 10:45 am
See Network Automation, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 12:00 pm
Respondents relied on Rust v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:07 am
(Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Loosely related state law claims sufficient for supplemental jurisdiction: Von Holdt v. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
