Search for: "RIDER v. STATE"
Results 601 - 620
of 784
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2011, 9:26 am
” “If I were not constrained by which I believe is binding precedent from the Ninth Circuit, and on-point precedent from other circuits, I would hold Section 1713 [Tester’s rider] is unconstitutional because it violates the Separation of Powers doctrine articulated by the Supreme Court in U.S. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 6:23 am
United States, 220 U.S. 523, 537, 31 S.Ct. 485, 488, 55 L.Ed. 570 (1911), quoting United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 11:03 am
If Congress passes a bill with a rider and the President vetoes, great: then EPA has no funding and must shut down completely. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 9:45 am
” United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 7:45 am
Fortunately, the unanimous three-judge appellate panel in Paletta v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 11:38 am
Review Granted Nalwa v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 3:46 am
Especially when you can come up with one like this for the case of Washington v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 2:00 pm
(As Harold Feld at Public Knowledge explains, turning off part of the telephone network also violates the Federal Communications Act.)BART claims that it was acting within the scope of a 1969 Supreme Court decision, Brandenburg v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 6:53 pm
" While most businesses operating in Florida owe their customers such a duty, the ruling of the state District Court of Appeal for the First District in Hinley v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 6:44 pm
The court, in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 6:54 am
Maryland and recently reaffirmed by a majority of Justices in United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 10:39 pm
See Consejo de Desarrollo Economico de Mexicali v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 8:23 pm
However, our Circuit has interpreted Robertson v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:56 pm
In the landmark case of Wickard v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 11:01 am
’s ESA claims over the delisting were unripe, and (2) ruled against the plaintiffs on their NEPA claims (Defenders of Wildlife v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 4:23 am
Co. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 10:45 am
The Sherley v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 3:06 pm
The case is Nalwa v Cedar Fair LP. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:10 am
v=d8CAKAXR-AMAfter that, it was back to the convention center for the exhibits. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:10 am
v=d8CAKAXR-AMAfter that, it was back to the convention center for the exhibits. [read post]
