Search for: "RILEY V. STATE" Results 601 - 620 of 1,080
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2019, 2:58 am by Walter Olson
Brunetti] Could someone remind the President of the United States that there’s no law against making fun of him on TV? [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 6:00 am
LEXIS 28499 (CD CA, April 2, 2009), a California federal magistrate judge dismissed, but allowed the filing of an amended complaint, by a Muslim inmate who claims his fre exercise rights were violated when he was denied a Halal diet.In Riley v. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 4:23 am
A spokeswoman for the governor said Wednesday afternoon that Riley would not stop the execution. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 11:31 am
Nothing in the statute suggests that the preemption analysis somehow depends on how the device is used.Caplinger, 921 F.Supp.2d at 1219 (quoting Riley v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:18 pm by Eugene Volokh
 Md.).The court concluded that the law does not regulate commercial speech (correct, I think, since it applies to organizations that provide free counseling as well as those that sell products or services), that it is not narrowly tailored to a compelling government interest in preventing fraud (also correct, I think, especially in light of cases such as Riley v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 11:47 am by Lyle Denniston
Kennedy said in the first argument, in Riley v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 8:00 am
(in support of petitioner) Amicus brief of National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation (in support of petitioner) Amicus brief of the United States (in support of petitioner) __________________ Docket: 07-77 Case name: Riley v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 8:01 am by Clara Spera
California and United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 1:36 pm
Riley, 2013 WL 475242 (California Court of Appeals 2013), and oral arguments are scheduled for April 29, 2014. [read post]