Search for: "ROMANS v. ROMANS"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,942
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Further, opined the Appellate Division, "[c]haracterizing a claim for breach of the duty of fair representation as one for breach of contract is unavailing to avoid the four-month limitations period," citing Roman v City Empls. [read post]
15 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
Thus, we agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiff was not discharged due to a protected recreational activity within the scope of Labor Law §201-d(2)(c) (see id.; Bilquin v Roman Catholic Church, Diocese of Rockville Ctr., 286 AD2d 409). [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
In response, two important religious entities-- one Catholic and one Jewish-- have filed separate suits challenging the new Order.The complaint (full text) in Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn, New York v. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 12:00 am
Further, opined the Appellate Division, "[c]haracterizing a claim for breach of the duty of fair representation as one for breach of contract is unavailing to avoid the four-month limitations period," citing Roman v City Empls. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:03 pm
ROMAN LINDA CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM G. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:03 pm
ROMAN LINDA CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM G. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 5:05 am
Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 st1:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) } /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes;… [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 11:42 am
Malone v. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 9:51 am
Instead of standing at the barricades over Roe v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 3:26 pm
No, says the Supreme Court of India in Sri Kumar Padma Prasad v Union of India : (1992) 2 SCC 428, an important case concerning the validity of appointment of a certain Mr Srivastava to the Gauhati High Court. [read post]
25 May 2009, 11:02 am
In TN Kalyana Mandapam v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 2:21 pm
Metz v. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 12:32 pm
The Holy Roman Emperor Maximillian I had just died, and his grandson Charles V was about to be crowed in Aachen as his successor. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 2:17 am
People v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 5:08 pm
Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 st1:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) } v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 7:38 am
Hartford Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 2:03 pm
And: William V. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 12:02 am
Tipton v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 5:26 pm
The case (available here) is US v. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 7:57 pm
-- /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-parent:""; margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";} @page Section1 {size:595.3pt 841.9pt; margin:70.85pt 3.0cm 70.85pt 3.0cm; mso-header-margin:35.4pt; mso-footer-margin:35.4pt; … [read post]