Search for: "Reed v. People" Results 601 - 620 of 813
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2011, 9:00 pm
Otherwise, the Supreme Court wrote in its 1992 case Quill Corp. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 6:41 am by Charon QC
Lucy Reed at Pink Tape considers a problem which can only get worse: Courts Hit By Disillusioned Litigants? [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:05 pm by Rick Hasen
Reed case involving disclosure of the names of people signing a referendum concerning Washington State’s gay rights law. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 2:52 pm by familoo
It may be obvious to lawyers, but it isn’t obvious to many other people. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 10:27 am by Adam Wagner
Judgments were also published in non-anyonmised form – see Doncaster v Haigh and Doncaster v Watson. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 12:37 pm by Kristina Araya
  The Court of Appeals recently held in People v Kolanek that the relevant deadline for obtaining the physician’s statement under the MMMA was the time of arrest. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 6:38 am by Kenji Yoshino
Reed, 1971) (women were later given a higher level of review by a majority of the Court in Craig v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 12:47 am by Melina Padron
Last week the Commission on a UK Bill of Rights launched a discussion paper asking people “Do we need a UK Bill of Rights? [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 1:12 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Review: Family Courts without a Lawyer: A Handbook for Litigants in Person – Lucy Reed – Buy book here Family Courts without a Lawyer : A Handbook for Litigants in Person is written by Lucy Reed, barrister and author of the Pink Tape blog. [read post]