Search for: "Republican National Committee v. Democratic National Committee"
Results 601 - 620
of 755
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2012, 4:30 am
National Academy of Sciences. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 11:32 am
In mid-November, congressional leaders of the House Committee on Homeland Security and the House Committee on Oversight and Reform wrote to the GAO’s comptroller general, citing “GAO’s statutory role in evaluating federal agency vacancies and FVRA issues” to request that the comptroller general “conduct an expedited review to resolve whether Mr. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:58 am
This is what the professor wrote that I found both defamatory and intellectually dishonest[v]: The Judicial Conference . . . suffers from a severe bias, which causes it not to ask for the creation of as many new judgeships as the nation needs. [read post]
1 May 2021, 4:17 pm
The Committee on Human Rights of the U.S. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 11:12 am
Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee (coordinated party spending limits), Federal Election Commission v. [read post]
8 Oct 2023, 9:39 pm
Since last week’s unprecedented ouster of Kevin McCarthy as Speaker of the House of Representatives, two leading candidates have emerged to take his place: Republican House Majority Leader Steve Scalise and Republican Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 6:41 am
Fidelity to the great principles on which great Republics, like ours, are founded also burden those privileged to enjoy its fruits (however much the distance may appear to separate the great Republican from its expression in any age) with equally great responsibility. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 12:28 pm
There are many areas of the law, from bankruptcy to patents to criminal justice, where they can show they are not engaged in the Red Team v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 10:28 am
Republicans and Democrats alike are calling on Congress to reconsider the extraordinary protections. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 4:15 pm
That decision, Crawford v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 2:48 pm
In 1990, in the case of Austin v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 1:19 pm
This tradeoff first showed up in a 2023 bill that Democratic and Republican members of the House commerce committee approved by an overwhelming 53-2 vote. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 1:06 pm
As we approach the presidential election this November, election officials are developing plans to deal with the unique risks posed by the novel coronavirus that causes COVID-19. [read post]
15 May 2009, 9:14 am
It is barred precisely because Republicans put politics over science and apparently the Obama Administration has chosen to get rolled on the issue, despite the damage done to both an accurate count AND to the political fortunes of the Democratic Party. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
See, e.g., Democratic National Committee v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 9:04 pm
Justice Robert Jackson famously described the Act four years later in the case of Wang Yang Sung v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 3:55 pm
District Court for the District of Colorado on behalf of three residents, alleging that the state had failed to clean its voter rolls as required by the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA) (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 8:16 am
The hearings included statements from Committee and Subcommittee members which demonstrated the stark differences between Democrats and Republicans on the issue; major testimony from Administration officials from EPA, the Department of Energy and Transportation; extensive testimony and questioning of former VP Al Gore, former Senator John Warner (R-VA); former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich; and major environmental, industry, state and local government officials, and… [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
Paul, Rust v. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 7:46 pm
A court may enforce an agreement preventing disclosure of specific information without violating the restricted party's First Amendment rights if the party received consideration in exchange for the restriction (see Democratic National Committee v Republican National Committee, 673 F3d 192, 204-207 [3d Cir]). [read post]
