Search for: "Research In Motion Limited"
Results 601 - 620
of 3,047
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2012, 7:21 pm
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is Eastman Kodak Company (“Kodak”) and the Respondents are Research in Motion, Ltd. and Research in Motion Corp. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:09 pm
The trial court had imposed a term of 60 months, the statutory maximum for this offense, and a term of community custody for earned early release limited to the statutory maximum. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 6:55 am
We cannot believe the motion to dismiss did not reach those issues. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 11:21 am
Oakley: The Court granted a motion to publish this case in part. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 7:37 pm
The federal lawsuit argues (1) that the genes are not patentable because they are "products of nature" and (2) that the patentee's use of patent rights to limit scientific research on the genes violates constitutional First Amendment protections. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 7:37 pm
The federal lawsuit argues (1) that the genes are not patentable because they are "products of nature" and (2) that the patentee's use of patent rights to limit scientific research on the genes violates constitutional First Amendment protections. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 12:10 pm
(“The wide variety of computer systems in use, and the rapidity of technological change, counsel against a limiting or a precise definition. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 10:32 am
In his motion, Pirker argued that the FAA did not have any authority to fine people operating drones because it had not issued formal rules governing their use. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 7:46 am
The second surgeon filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing the plaintiff’s claims against her were barred by the two and a half year statute of limitations for medical malpractice actions in New York. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 11:20 am
Putnam Supreme converted the motion to dismiss into one for summary judgment and granted the motion. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 2:17 pm
Courtesy of Law Offices of Dena Alo-Colbeck “Writing and Research for Washington Attorneys” The following criminal cases of note were decided this week: Washington State Law Division One Court of Appeals State v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 11:44 am
Those motions are both sealed in their entirety. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 2:58 pm
" The outcome of this case could expand or limit the ownership rights of universities and the federal government, at odds with the interests of research companies and university researchers. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 10:33 am
Courtesy of Law Offices of Dena Alo-Colbeck “Writing and Research for Washington Attorneys” Washington State Law Washington State Supreme Court Seattle v. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 6:53 am
The feds were about to be hit with a Tsunami of compassionate release motions and the fed judges and their clerks went to work researching the law and writing opinions, and saving lives by releasing defendants. [read post]
16 May 2018, 10:04 am
The district court granted Interstate’s motion for a new trial. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 4:20 am
To provide more detail on the 52 cases depicted in Figure 1 that reached a certification decision, the three-year limitations period would have expired before an order on a free-standing motion for class certification in 11 of 12 cases reaching such an order. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am
The remaining data protection claim will be transferred to the County Court for trial and has been stayed whilst the parties engage in ADR at the court’s motion. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 6:08 am
Taken together, this Court concludes that Congress could not have contemplated that the UST would undertake exhaustive research or discovery before filing a motion to dismiss. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 10:22 am
Murphy’s article Chenery Unmasked: Reasonable Limits on the Duty to Give Reasons is cited in the following article: Kathryn E. [read post]
