Search for: "Ring v. Ring"
Results 601 - 620
of 2,652
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2008, 10:11 am
Two for one always has an attractive ring. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 7:28 pm
The court also found that the lower court erred in finding the wedding rings to be marital property, but were instead non-marital property. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 10:47 am
Recently, in EEOC v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 9:11 pm
Takeda Pharma. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 1:05 am
But it’s fine to use an heirloom ring for a marriage. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 10:58 pm
Give us a ring! [read post]
9 May 2016, 3:17 am
" TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 11:56 am
Circuit in ACA International v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 7:23 am
Fuelbelt, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 8:12 am
Guzman v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:28 am
According to U.S. ex rel Davis v. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 1:42 pm
DocName=075000050HPt%2E+V&ActID=2086&ChapterID=59&SeqStart=6100000&SeqEnd=8350000 [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 6:24 am
The case is Hurst v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 6:40 am
But that defense rings hollow, since the prior religious event, also involving food, allowed inmates that eat in their cells. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 7:25 am
Nijensohn v. [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 6:22 am
Yang analysed the recent judgment in Optis v Apple Trial E (one of six related trials), which focuses on the terms of a FRAND licence and the conduct of the parties in the negotiations.Marcel Pemsel reviewed the new book by Pierre Heuzé, written in French, entitled L'épuisement des droits de propriété intellectuelle sur un matériel biologique en droit suisse [Exhaustion of intellectual property rights in biological material under Swiss law]. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 8:49 am
" Turpin v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:53 am
CopyrightEleonora Rosati also announced an event to discuss the judgment of the Court of Appeal of England & Wales in THJ v Sheridan [2023] EWCA Civ 1354. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 7:46 am
If you've been too busy pumpkin shopping to keep up with the latest news, don't worry - the IPKat is here to bring you up to speed.PatentsThis Kat hasn't quite got the hang of carving Jack-O-LanternsKatfriend Léon Dijkman provided an update about 10X Genomics v Nanostring - the first-ever injunction decision by the new Unified Patent Court (UPC). [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 7:35 pm
Supreme Court on Sept. 7 in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
