Search for: "Risk v. Wells Market Service, Inc." Results 601 - 620 of 1,029
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
  These questions, among others, find a response in yesterday's judgment of High Court for England and Wales, Chancery Division, ruling of Mr Justice Arnold in Enterprise Holdings Inc v Europcar Group UK and Another[2015] EWHC 17 (Ch).BackgroundEnterprise and Europcar are two heavyweights of the car rental market. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The possibility of litigation reform through bylaw revision received a substantial boost in May 2014, when the Delaware Supreme Court in the ATP Tours, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
  Compared to this type of gamesmanship, removal before service is bush league. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 1:14 am by Jani
The test was phrased well by Justice Brandeis in Kellogg v National Biscuit: "...the primary significance of the term in the minds of the consuming public is not the product but the producer". [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]