Search for: "SB v. State" Results 601 - 620 of 1,106
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2012, 6:00 am by Jeff Marshall
It is intended to fix the problems created by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision in Vine v. [read post]
17 May 2022, 9:36 am by Daniel Jin
The House passed SB 1 – An Act Concerning Childhood Mental and Physical Health Services in Schools in concurrence with the Senate. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 6:50 am by Eric Goldman
Brown signed SB 1121, the first of possibly several amendments designed to fix and rehabilitate the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 8:42 am by Eric Goldman
The court summarizes: The primary effect of the DPIA provision is to compel speech…The State cannot insulate a specific provision of law from a facial challenge under the First Amendment by bundling it with other, separate provisions that do not implicate the First Amendment The court also says that the DPIA requirement “deputizes covered businesses into serving as censors for the State” because the DPIA risk “factors require consideration of content or… [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 8:10 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Anyway, here are what I consider Perry's worst criminal-justice related vetoes:Maximizing police arrest powersPhoto via The EconomistSB 730 (2001): After the US Supreme Court ruled in Atwater v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 8:23 am by Garret Murai
First a Bit of Background In 2002, the California State Legislature enacted the Right to Repair Act, also known simply by its bill number, SB 800. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 10:04 am
The bill would override a notable 2009 court decision, Palmer/Sixth Street Properties, L.P. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 4:46 pm by HS_admin
  When negotiations become a problem, it is absolutely essential that the Association be able to have access to the legal system.Instead of introducing the construction defect bill, SB 14-219 was introduced into the Senate. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 9:43 am
  We have provided guidance on this issue for numerous CEQA documents throughout the state. [read post]
29 Mar 2008, 12:45 pm by James Peters
It is fairly common for sweeping employment law legislation to be introduced in the California legislature and I usually do not pay much attention to these bills because they usually do not become law.One of two things almost always happens: (1) the republicans introduce a pro-employer bill that will never pass the democratically-controlled legislature or (2) the democrats introduce a pro-employee bill that passes but is then vetoed by Governor Schwarzenegger.However, I gave an interview to a… [read post]
SB 699 expands this prohibition to not only non-competes entered into in California, but also out-of-state non-competes. [read post]
SB 699 expands this prohibition to not only non-competes entered into in California, but also out-of-state non-competes. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:09 am by Rosalind English
Again, the context, of course, is the detention by the State of children and young persons. [read post]