Search for: "SMITH v. STATE OF FLORIDA"
Results 601 - 620
of 974
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2013, 6:24 am
On March 4, 2013, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, in the matter of Foley v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 4:21 pm
Upset by the state constitutional amendment, a group took the issue to federal court to challenge the constitutionality of Proposition 8 and won on August 4, 2010 (See Perry v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 12:47 pm
See, e.g., Carras v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 3:04 pm
Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc., 55 F. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 2:04 pm
” Smith v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 2:04 pm
” Smith v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 4:09 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 1:24 pm
” Smith v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 1:24 pm
” Smith v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
This post is by the Reed Smith part of the blog only. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 2:24 pm
The company submitted a cert petition noting that the US Supreme Court had recently reversed the Florida’s state court ruling in KPMB v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:23 pm
[T]he United States [FDA] requires the tablet manufacturers . . . to account for and warn of a drug’s properties. [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 2:14 pm
District Court for the Central District of California.Pacemaker: FLORIDA PACEMAKER DEATH CLAIM PREEMPTED BY FEDERAL LAW, McClelland v. [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 2:14 pm
FLORIDA ATLANTIC STOCK TRANSFER, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 5:26 am
State v. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 5:27 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 4:35 am
The plaintiff argued against applying the principle of comity, but, citing Smith v. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 11:15 am
Smith v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:58 am
LA Fitness International: Shifting Costs to Seek Fairness in Discovery – Reed Smith – http://bit.ly/NejzAg (Patricia Antezana) Warrantless Phone Search Deemed Unconstitutional; Destroys State’s Murder Case – http://bit.ly/P5BXJW (IT-Lex) We Produced Privileged Documents; Now What? [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 6:26 pm
SMITH and DIEBOLD INCORPORATED, Petitioners, v. [read post]