Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF C. C."
Results 601 - 620
of 27,571
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2012, 1:54 am
I v Oberbürgermeisterin der Stadt Remscheid (Case C-348/09); [2012] WLR (D) 157 “An individual who had committed an offence, including those referred to in article 83(1)FEU of the FEU Treaty, such as the sexual exploitation of children, could be regarded as constituting a particularly serious threat to one of the fundamental interests of society and therefore could be excluded from a host member state on ‘imperative ground[s] of public security’… [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 9:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 5:27 am
C told him to stop, stating that they were only speaking metaphorically, but Mismas insisted he was serious. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 7:49 am
State v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 7:14 am
For example, Lannett sold C-Topical to McKesson Corp., a wholesaler whose website indicated that C-Topical is generic and does not state that it is unapproved by the FDA. [read post]
16 May 2012, 10:16 am
Law Offices of Irene C. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 12:02 pm
Patent Nos. 6,532,109 and 6,816,308; and G. award Draper pre-judgment and post-judgment interests on damages. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 5:04 pm
It will be interesting to see whether this case makes it to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 5:52 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 9:45 am
On 2 April 2009, the ECJ has delivered its judgment in case C-523/07 (A). [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:22 am
As the Medicare Part C saga continues to get more interesting, it appears that NY law precludes Medicare Advantage Plans from collecting reimbursement from personal injury proceeds at all. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 8:34 am
On March 3, 2010, the KSC transferred State v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 5:25 am
Over the past months, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has had to open three different files in this regard, with one glorious EU country (Poland), and a couple of UK judges seeking clarification as to the lawfulness of the Directive under different standpoints [Cases C-358/14, Poland v Parliament and Council; C-477/14, Pillbox 38(UK) Limited v Secretary of State for Health; and C-547/14, Philip Morris Brands SARL and Others v Secretary of… [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 4:57 pm
The petitioners demurred to his objection, stating that Mr. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 9:09 am
L. c. 211E, § 3(e). [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 9:12 am
Generally, a majority of the directors (not including the vote of the interested director) must approve such transaction after disclosure of the director’s interest. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 7:59 am
Here is CAAF’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 4:34 pm
(photo by Cobalt 123)In the ABC's of Conflict Resolution, we call “cowards” by another "C" term. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 4:00 am
DeGirolami, Religious Accommodation, Religious Tradition, and Political Polarization, (Lewis & Clark Law Review, Forthcoming).Christopher C. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
From SSRN:Lucy C. [read post]