Search for: "STATE V. HARPER"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,022
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm
High times at the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service [Luke Rosiak, Examiner via Jim Harper, Cato] 6th Circuit: In ruling company’s suit against union to be unfair labor practice, NLRB breezed past First Amendment issues [NLRB v. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 5:30 am
Idaho 2013http://t.co/rcr4092Nau -> Copyright in advertisements canvassed in Harner v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am
Then, state and federal courts were reluctant to apply tort law even where automobile-accident victims claimed their injuries resulted from the failure of manufacturers to exercise reasonable care in the design of their motor vehicles. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 11:55 pm
Lee v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 9:44 am
• • • Incentives to share: why copyright continues to play a role online was originally posted on Copyhype • • • FootnotesABC v Aereo, No. 12-Civ-1540(AJN), order denying preliminary injunction (SDNY, July 11, 2012).Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 5:01 am
The United States Supreme Court recognized this principle in Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 11:23 am
Prime Minister Stephen Harper made the announcement this morning. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
[4] Guerin v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 6:32 am
Court” Concordia Journal (17 January 2008), online: http://cjournal.concordia.ca/archives/20080117/ concordias_restitution_efforts_lead_to_landmark_ruling_in_us_court.php; United States Court of Appeals, Vineberg v Bissonnette 08-1136 November 19 2008; Max Stern Estate: 10th Painting Reclaimed” (5 March 2013) Concordia News Stories, online: http://www.concordia.ca/content/concordia/en/news/stories/2013/03/05/ max-stern-estate-10th-painting-reclaimed.html;… [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 11:14 am
United States v Harper, Department of Revenue of Montana v Kurth Ranch, Cordero v Lalor, and United States v Ursery settled that a sanction in a "civil" or non-criminal proceeding may constitute punishment for double jeopardy purposes. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 5:00 pm
The Supreme Court’s 1939 decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 12:32 am
Stephen Pitel, Jesse Harper, Choice of Law for Tort in Canada: Reasons for Change In 1994 the Supreme Court of Canada in Tolofson v Jensen adopted a new and controversial choice of law rule for tort claims. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 6:27 pm
Walling v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:40 am
Windsor in United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
Staying with the context of antitrust law, take the example of FTC v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 11:07 am
”6 In support, he cites Eldred v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 5:46 am
American Institute of Physics v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:00 am
He stated that "You don't need to fix the patent system - it's not broken. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 4:52 pm
Agent G states in the Criminal Complaint that he reviewed a letter sent to A at her home, postmarked 20 October 2008, which stated in part: “I remember our past experiences together so fondly. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 10:19 am
See Washington v. [read post]
