Search for: "STATE v CLOSE"
Results 601 - 620
of 27,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2009, 5:01 pm
In State v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 7:15 am
See Stiller v. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
The 5-3 opinion in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 3:54 pm
In Rose v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 9:13 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2007, 6:49 pm
State v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
And as anyone who works closely with state legislatures can tell you, state Republican parties lead even the national party in their stampede toward the MAGA and ultra-MAGA right. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 3:34 pm
Judge Block reasoned that NY's rule was constitutional under McGowan v. [read post]
30 Jun 2018, 9:47 am
Additional Resources: Rehabilitation Center at Hollywood Hills v. [read post]
30 Jun 2018, 9:47 am
Additional Resources: Rehabilitation Center at Hollywood Hills v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 5:08 am
Today will be the closing arguments in the Federal challenge to California's Proposition 8. [read post]
14 May 2012, 10:07 am
The lawsuit alleges that Tumblr violated the United States Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 8:39 am
Miller v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 10:07 pm
Following close behind the Coast Guard CCA’s decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:14 pm
Wade but also Griswold v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 1:20 pm
Also, Mitchell Keiter (Keiter Appellate Law) argues that SCOTUS should reverse the 9th Circuit in 'NIFLA v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 2:14 pm
State v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 12:10 pm
(Justices Ginsberg and Stevens, neither of whom, I might add, remain either on the Court or breathing).Given that the Supreme Court has indisputably said that primaries have to be closed if that's what the party wants, the plaintiff's argument here that it's unconstitutional for a state to allow primaries to be closed is a surefire loser. [read post]
14 May 2017, 1:56 pm
On May 14, 1973, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Frontiero v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:33 pm
EMA, concerning the constitutionality of state regulation of violent video games, and McComish v. [read post]
