Search for: "STATE v. KEEN"
Results 601 - 620
of 907
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2010, 2:00 am
Gaza conflict a “lawful excuse” In R v ? [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 4:00 am
The court in Pollard v BABN recommends opening up the pandora’s box of US file wrapper estoppel contrary to Free World, and seems keen to second guess the Patent Office’s acceptance of an applicant’s representations. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:32 am
In the recent rulings of McGraddie v McGraddie [2013] UKSC 58 and Henderson v Foxworth Investments Ltd [2014] UKSC 41 the Supreme Court overturned an appellate court for interfering with a trial judge’s findings of fact. [read post]
24 Jun 2007, 10:49 pm
It did so in Pozzoli SPA v BDMO SA and others [2007] EWCA Civ 588 (available here in full on BAILII), a ruling on Friday 22 June 2007. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 2:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 5:54 pm
Wyndham Worldwide – What it Means for Hotel Owners by Bob Braun, Hotel Lawyer and Data Security Advisor Background on the case On August 24, 2015, the Third Circuit United States Court of Appeals issued its ruling in the case FTC v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 9:21 pm
Of course, when regulated firms push for deregulation, they are keen to keep subsidies, implicit and explicit. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 11:06 pm
Keene, W. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 12:02 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 4:24 am
” Estate of Frankl v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 1:35 am
Supreme Court’s 1988 decision in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 2:22 pm
The witness statement in support by the claimant’s solicitor stated “I was keen to ensure that this was accurate and I have spoken to his GP, Dr Yeld. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 7:07 pm
He then proceeds to introduce the case that brings us all to the Miami federal courthouse—or, rather, that brought us here 27 hours ago: The United States of America v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:51 am
Finally, after the conclusion of the judgment, the Court added a ‘postscript’ expressing concern at the recent re-statement by the ECtHR in X v Latvia (App no 27853/09) that Hague Convention cases demanded an in-depth examination of the entire family situation (as initially expressed, controversially, in Neulinger and Shuruk v Switzerland [2011] 1 FLR 122), and stating its conviction that such an in-depth examination is not required either by the terms of the… [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Instead, the judges found that the sole responsibility lies with individual uploaders, even though German collection society GEMA was keen to point out "YouTube generates substantial economic profits by making the videos available". [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:10 pm
Altman v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:10 pm
Altman v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 5:30 pm
The case I'm talking about is Western Filter Corp. v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 12:16 am
Judge Walker writes in the first China Cases InsightTM, titled In Qihu v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 12:14 pm
On August 24, 2015, the Third Circuit United States Court of Appeals issued its ruling in the case FTC v. [read post]
